I don't understand why BSF lumps all of his immigration grievances together, because it undermines his points. The US is in no way being overrun with immigrants from the Middle East, so why bring up immigrant welfare statistics here? Why not try and stay on point, instead of using this discussion as a dumping ground for all your populist bitchings
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
Why do you want to know???
Why don't you try to comprehend what I wrote and what I was responding to? The conversation had morphed into a general discussion about immigration- look at what Barca was responding to when he posted the "Give me your tired..." sampler. So my post was a response to that and a comment leebs made about how we shouldn't take into account a person's wealth or education when letting them immigrate here. Understand?
...I'm not really sure what this has to do with anything ...
It never morphed, you just went off on a tangent -
Scooter84 asked a few general questions about immigration in response to the discussion about the legality of banning Muslim immigrants. Barca then sarcastically (?) posted a cross-stitch of the statue of liberty poem. In response to the statue of liberty poem you went on a tangent about how America can't realistically follow the ideals from that poem because the population of Africa is exploding and South American immigrants use more welfare.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
Maybe President Trump can re-gift the statue of liberty to another country, since we're not using it anymore.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
Scooter, very simply, would you be OK with a ban Christians coming to America?
If not and you believe this country was created on the basis of religious freedom, you shouldn't be for a ban on another religion.
A discussion about the realities and legality of banning Muslim immigrants is interesting, and it's relevant to the event that happened. I'd like to see a reasonable explanation of how that would work, especially in context of America's role as a world champion of religious tolerance
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
What are you talking about? I never advocated or mentioned banning anyone. I asked some simple questions about how it works today - because I don't know and because people were talking about changing or limiting immigration. For the record I would never advocate a blanket ban of immigration by any religion or other demographic - except for the demographic of known or credibly suspected terrorists.
If it makes you feel better, then yes, I am so upset because you are right. yada yada yada let's move on.Great, just ignore my posts and focus on that. Not difficult. Though I suspect the real reason you were bothered is that you didn't like the facts I posted, about some of the costs involved with immigration.
If it makes you feel better, then yes, I am so upset because you are right. yada yada yada let's move on.
Sent from my SM-G935T using Tapatalk
so I'm just curious how this Muslim ban works in practice. here's a list of the various ways people can legally enter the US (not including tourist visas, so add that to the list). http://www.immigrationpolicy.org/just-facts/how-united-states-immigration-system-works-fact-sheet Which of these methods are to be foreclosed from Muslims/people originating from a list of Muslim countries (which I think is actually how it would be done)? And what countries are on the list of Muslim states that are to be barred?
This appears to be some form of PC inflicted malady that is manifested by the inability to consider views different from our own as anything but some form of irrationality or prejudice.