There were a couple of good questions that addressed a few concerns expressed on this board in a non-confrontational way, which allowed for some in-depth answers.
Now, maybe he was completely blowing smoke, and I think it would have been totally legit to ask him to put the rebounding philosophy in the context of his Colorado and Air Force teams, but it came across as less defensive than I have heard him in the past, and his answers certainly weren't delivered in a tone which indicated that he was passing blame. And though it wouldn't have been justified, asking him to explain the Air Force and Colorado rebounding numbers would have definitely come across as defensive and probably clouded his point, which everyone would have picked up on instead of the meat of his argument.
The answers were alright. He talked about offensive rebounding almost as an extension of the offense, which, though understandable, isn't really what I wanted to hear and could point to the reason that, though he says he stresses it, it isn't getting across.
Him going on about Chase was pretty classic. Top 5 Bz interview moment for sure. I was dying.