To my eyes the #metoo political hit is de riguer. It is the ‘soup of the day’ among the seasoned operatives and so provides excellent cover for deeper motivations. Who is behind the hit? At first blush it seems all roads lead to Bernie..you have an erstwhile surrogate revive an event and use the prototypical language of a movement that needs, itself, an occasional scalp for sustained momentum and exposure.
Biden’s weaknesses (politically)..what are they? Do they extend beyond hair sniffing and insensitive gaffes?
If Joe were to be the nominee it would ignite a mutual whatabout-battle between he and Trump. Sexual peccadillos would be largely off the table as a weapon against Trump. Biden’s past comments on race would also attenuate any perceived advantage to attack the President.
These aspects appear fairly routine and banal. But what other motivations could there be for D power brokers to clip Biden this early in the game? The answer may be found in the “Russia” investigation which strangely has had more to do with the Ukraine. The Podestas and Manafort..McCain’s Kiev connections with the Nazi’s (real Nazi’s) of the Svoboda Party. Biden could be a gateway to what has previously been laid fully at the feet of Paul Manafort and by implication, Trump.
But any kind of dive - say a perusal of Bare Naked Capitalism will reveal Hunter Biden’s involvement with a firm that has also hired family from other DC brokers (family and friends) who have also acquired curious appointments to boards of companies ultimately listed in Cyprus.
The Hill fires the first warning shot across the bow.. and one wonders what the public will think if it begins to become newsworthy? When people sit down and see for themselves “well, it looks like all kinds of DC hands are in the natural gas bonanza and money laundering machine that is the Ukraine!”
https://thehill.com/opinion/white-h...ukrainian-nightmare-a-closed-probe-is-revived
—a little too close to home, methinks :
Two years after leaving office, Joe Biden couldn’t resist the temptation last year to brag to an audience of foreign policy specialists about the time as vice president that he strong-armed Ukraine into firing its top prosecutor.
In his own words, with video cameras rolling, Biden described how he threatened Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko in March 2016 that the Obama administration would pull $1 billion in U.S. loan guarantees, sending the former Soviet republic toward insolvency, if it didn’t immediately fire Prosecutor General Viktor Shokin.
“I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion.’ I’m going to be leaving here in, I think it was about six hours. I looked at them and said: ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money,’” Biden recalled telling Poroshenko.
“Well, son of a bitch, he got fired. And they put in place someone who was solid at the time,” Biden told the Council on Foreign Relations event, insisting that President Obama was in on the threat.