That's not exactly a revolutionary breakdown of freshman playing time under this new rule.
He launched into this in full at media day a couple of weeks ago. Main gist was that he and the staff have a plan for how they'll utilize the new rule, but he's not going to share that before the season. Or at least, he wasn't going to share it in mid-July. I'm sure halfway through the season, it'll be pretty discernible. Here's part of the quote:
"I’d say this: there’s still three decisions that we make. Every freshman, we say one of three things:
If they can help us win, we’re going to play them. That won’t change.
If they can’t help us win, we’re not going to play them. I mean, you’re not just going to play a guy four games. If he’s not good enough to play, he’s not good enough to play.
It’s that middle group that we call “Red Alert,” that we would like to redshirt them but they’re an injury or two injuries away from having to play. That middle group is the group that I think you can maybe try to get them in for a game or two early, see how they do and if they clearly show up and they’re ready to play, they go in the play category. If they’re not ready and they’re overwhelmed, they go in the redshirt category. If they’re kind of in that middle area, you’d like to maybe save a game or two of their eligibility. Let’s say it’s Week 8 and we’re playing on four-day rest and you have a kid that twisted his ankle.
You’d like to have that not be his fifth game and lose the year. You’d like to have maybe a game or two in the bank that you could get through that one- or two-week injury without completely blowing a year of eligibility."
Hopefully that makes sense. I might try to spell this out more later in the fall or at some point during the season, but hopefully this can give yall a general idea of how the staff feels about the new rule.