There are two distinct groups of BzzInners, based on my observations. The first group, no matter how poorly we play, will insist that it was "good basketball" and they're "encouraged" by our performance. See Tau's post on the previous page for an example. Even the State game can be dismissed as a fluke.
The second group is at least in touch enough with reality to recognize a poor performance when they see it. However, there's always some excuse for the lackluster play: We're too young, We're not deep enough, Walker/Harris missed the game, and so forth and so on.
The unofficial motto of the first group appears to be "No performance too bad." That of the second is ostensibly "No excuse too flimsy."
Why do I get looped in with being out of touch with reality for my post? We were outmanned in the post and this is the worst possible team for Travis to play matchup-wise. That's seeing things as a reality in my opinion. I liked that Bzz tried to set Travis up with open corner shots that he has hit at a decent clip for most of the season. Certainly didn't work out tonight but not a terrible idea given the guys defending him.
It's always going to be tough game offensively when you have only 2 real offensive options going against on of the better defensive teams in the country that has more athletes than you at every position. Did I say WF played great? No not at all. Read my post again and tell me what I said was being anything other than rational. It's not a large stretch to think bringing in more post players, and more perimeter talent, added to Travis and CJ, leads to some cautious optimism for next season. If you think I mean competing for the ACC next season you are the one out of touch with reality.