If anything, I would have been the one insinuating that. And to a degree I was only in so much as I pointed out the possibility of it happening.
You see, in this thread JH has devoted great time to denying the use of AA in the military (in spite of evidence to the contrary including a document signed by top brass of multiple branches of the very military he holds in such high regards) using as his only evidence the fact the USAF has a name redacted, photoless review process thus making the USAF totally race blind (we also have DeacinBama saying the Army, I believe, includes names and pictures so at least one branch isn't race blind). I simply pointed out that if the piece of information heavily weighted in a decision in promotion (performance review) is put together by somebody who knows the race of the individual the process isn't actually fully race blind. The output is but the input is not necessarily. Basically, his only piece of evidence isn't even actually race blind. I didn't make my post to say that is how AA is carried out in the military, just that the process in question isn't actually race blind. Personally I trust the top military brass that say AA has been used quite effectively to enhance the diversity of military leadership.