• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

IRS "loses" Lois Lerner e-mails from illegal targeting scandal

ONW said:
I know, it would be like Conservatives having open contempt for gay liberals.
Click to expand...

Hell conservatives wouldn't let gay conservatives who had donated over $1M into an event.
 
Interesting how in jhmd world, there's nothing wrong with white conservatives not liking black liberals, but it's ugly racial politics when white liberals don't like black conservatives.
 
Interesting how jhmd has no response to information that the IRS targeted liberal and conservative groups for additional scrutiny.
 
PhDeac said:
Interesting how in jhmd world, there's nothing wrong with white conservatives not liking black liberals, but it's ugly racial politics when white liberals don't like black conservatives.
Click to expand...

At what point do you intend to stop disingenuously mischaracterizing opposing points of view? Pretty damned tiresome.
 
ONW said:
I remember your outrage during this government conspiracy...

"Between late 2005 and January 2006, the Bush administration tried to recover "lost" emails from staffers who worked in the Office of the Vice President (OVP), an effort centered on a critical week - October 1 through October 6, 2003. That same week the Justice Department announced it was investigating the unauthorized leak of Valerie Plame Wilson's covert CIA status.

But one name was missing from the list of 70 individuals whose email accounts White House technicians searched in an attempt to recover and restore missing emails: I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby."

"The search of individual email accounts was conducted after an internal investigation by officials in the Office of Administration concluded that emails from the Office of Vice President Dick Cheney between September 30, 2003 and October 6, 2003 were lost and unrecoverable."

"Under the terms of the agreement, 94 days of missing emails will be restored, which includes emails from the Office of the Vice President that Fitzgerald subpoenaed that were unaccounted for during the week of September 30 and October 6, 2003. The time frame also coincided with litigation surrounding the release of documents related to Cheney's Energy Task Force meetings."


"And the failure to turn over evidence Fitzgerald had previously sought may have prompted him to reveal in a January 23, 2006, court filing:


"In an abundance of caution, we advise you that we have learned that not all email of the Office of the Vice President and the Executive Office of the President for certain time periods in 2003 was preserved through the normal archiving process on the White House computer system."


http://truth-out.org/archive/compon...s-missing-emails-subpoenaed-in-cia-leak-probe
Click to expand...

I'd really like to see you compare and contrast the difference between the CIA leak probe and the IRS probe.
 
HeltonCreek said:
Interesting how jhmd has no response to information that the IRS targeted liberal and conservative groups for additional scrutiny.
Click to expand...

Interesting how someone would invoke the Fifth Amendment if that was actually true.
 
jhmd2000 said:
Interesting how someone would invoke the Fifth Amendment if that was actually true.
Click to expand...

jhmd, do you think the authors of the Constitution wrote the Fifth Amendment to help liars and crooks get away with their crimes?
 
jhmd2000 said:
At what point do you intend to stop disingenuously mischaracterizing opposing points of view? Pretty damned tiresome.
Click to expand...

ironymeter.jpg
 
89DeaconMike said:
http://news.yahoo.com/emails-irs-official-sought-audit-204035386.html;_ylt=AwrBEiKHOqtTER4ARUnQtDMD

So at the end of the day, does Lerner take the blame for everything and does her time? (Till Obama pardons her in Jan 2017) Or does she get tired of all this, get immunity and take everyone else down?
Click to expand...

Shocker that one of the "lost emails" turns up with incriminatory evidence. She's invoked her rights against self-incrimination and two solid years of correspondence last in her possession has gone missing, and it took a year for her to get around to acknowledging that fact. It takes a complete dupe to believe she isn't hiding something (not that many aren't gleefully playing the role of those dupes).
 
I'm dealing with an issue where a wife ran a business and hired a cpa to do all of the returns and just had her husband give her his W-2's.

Turns out she forged his signature on all the returns and never paid tax on the income from her business.

He applied for Innocent Spouse relief and the answer was "Sorry. You should have known."
 
DeaconCav06 said:
I'm dealing with an issue where a wife ran a business and hired a cpa to do all of the returns and just had her husband give her his W-2's.

Turns out she forged his signature on all the returns and never paid tax on the income from her business.

He applied for Innocent Spouse relief and the answer was "Sorry. You should have known."
Click to expand...

Do as I say...
 
jhmd2000 said:
Shocker that one of the "lost emails" turns up with incriminatory evidence. She's invoked her rights against self-incrimination and two solid years of correspondence last in her possession has gone missing, and it took a year for her to get around to acknowledging that fact. It takes a complete dupe to believe she isn't hiding something (not that many aren't gleefully playing the role of those dupes).
Click to expand...

jhmd logic world. Where a man forcing himself on a woman isn't a crime, but an IRS agent asking another if an audit should be instigated is a clear crime.

I will say that she seems quite overzealous, and it is better she is no longer working at the agency.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top