• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

The Mueller Investigation Is in Mortal Danger

Also if you are really that concerned about "hacking" then how do you square a Presidential candidate publicly calling on a foreign adversary to hack his opponent's email?

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the thirty thousand e-mails that are missing,” the Republican nominee had declared. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.” - Don Trump, July 2016

Him saying this is what sort of clears him from the idea he had some sort of back channel agreement with Russians in place.
 
Didn’t he say that days after having back channel communication with Russia about the emails?
 
[/B]

Sorry but I'm calling you out on BS whataboutism here.

There are certainly other examples of corrupt campaigning but there is no historical precedent for the allegations in this investigation.

And if you think campaign finance (assuming you're defining it as foreign money influencing US elections and policy) is a big problem...then a rational person would assume you are deeply concerned by evidence of Russia influencing a US Presidential election and policy.


you are simply parroting the party line for partisan dems

a rational person would understand that the problems referred to are not merely problems of the Trump presidency but problems for both parties and would not allow themselves to be overwhelmed by the obviously partisan hysteria of investigating only one side and trying at all costs to obstruct and debilitate the Trump presidency

everyone should be deeply concerned about what TDS is doing to the political system and the country

the allegations are certainly unprecedented, but allegations are just allegations, and politically motivated ones at that

charges of "whataboutism" are just a hapless bullshit efforts to deflect from Democrat malfeasance
 
Also if you are really that concerned about "hacking" then how do you square a Presidential candidate publicly calling on a foreign adversary to hack his opponent's email?

“Russia, if you’re listening, I hope you’re able to find the thirty thousand e-mails that are missing,” the Republican nominee had declared. “I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press.” - Don Trump, July 2016

an obvious joke and throw-away line, get a life
 
you are simply parroting the party line for partisan dems

a rational person would understand that the problems referred to are not merely problems of the Trump presidency but problems for both parties and would not allow themselves to be overwhelmed by the obviously partisan hysteria of investigating only one side and trying at all costs to obstruct and debilitate the Trump presidency

everyone should be deeply concerned about what TDS is doing to the political system and the country

the allegations are certainly unprecedented, but allegations are just allegations, and politically motivated ones at that

charges of "whataboutism" are just a hapless bullshit efforts to deflect from Democrat malfeasance

Parroting party lines? Dude I spent nearly a decade working for Republican candidates.

I've actually had the balls to publicly call out my party and walk away from it (including any chance of returning to a career in the GOP).

That's the exact opposite of partisanship.
 
Last edited:
Parroting party lines? Dude I spent nearly a decade working for Republican candidates.

I've actually had the balls to publicly call out my party.

That's the exact opposite of partisanship.


partisanship is calling for - indeed being obsessed with - investigating only one side

call out yourself, that's who really needs to be called out
 
partisanship is calling for - indeed being obsessed with - investigating only one side

call out yourself, that's who really needs to be called out

No ruling necessary.
 
why don't you demand investigations to follow the Clinton cash?

Because every penny the Clinton Foundation took in was accounted every year.

Why can't you answer this one:

"Let's see the NSA was an active foreign agent while working in the WH. The Campaign Manager was a foreign agent who was employed by Russians for much of the past decade to further their political influence. The son and son-in-law of POTUS actively sought out Russian aid for personal and political reasons. POTUS has been kissing Putin's ass publicly for over two years. POTUS received hundreds of millions of dollars from Russians. EVERY US intel agency agree that the Russians hacked our election. Russians spent money and created bots on Facebook and Twitter.

But sailor this is a "a partisan hatchet job". Even though the Ass't. AG who named Mueller is a lifelong Republican.

How is this so?"
 
partisanship is calling for - indeed being obsessed with - investigating only one side

call out yourself, that's who really needs to be called out

You are the exact reason why the Republican Party is where it's at today. A fringe party for 30% of the country. And zero self awareness.
 
Last edited:
a profane overly aggressive hostile response to someone merely starting the obvious, get some counseling before TDS completely consumes your ability to think and behave

Also an appropriate response to someone who says "get a life".
 
Last edited:
Sailor really might be brain damaged so it is a bad look to tell the handicapped to fuck off.
 
Do think he's right about one thing though. Going after finances > going after Russia.
 
Do think he's right about one thing though. Going after finances > going after Russia.

Good thing the investigation is doing both because Trump’s finances are heavily connected to Russia.
 
Back
Top