PhDeac
PM a mod to cement your internet status forever
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 155,582
- Reaction score
- 22,596
Completely depends on what you're talking about with coaching. Your original "take coaching over talent" comment seemed to clearly imply coaching without recruiting (aka talent - so just game planning, in game coaching, etc.). If you want to say you meant coaching counts as having someone who can bring in talent AND coach then the conversation should be over because that's not what the argument started as. A talent v coaching argument should imply a great coach with a bad team v a bad coach with a great team - otherwise its an argument of a great coach with a great team v a bad coach with a great team which has an obvious answer.
We were talking about college coaches. You implied wrong.