Shooshmoo
Well-known member
I welcome reasonable dialectic.
LOL
I welcome reasonable dialectic.
apologies for using it correctly
Its ok for you to just admit you were wrong.don't tell ChrisL
It's kinda sad and pathetic how all these people calling me BSF4L (I have no idea who that is) refuse to substantively engage with the points I make. I welcome reasonable dialectic. If pigeonholing me into some narrow construction of a previous poster makes you feel safe and less threatened from my efforts to seek out uncomfortable truths, then by all means continue to do so. Glib ad hominem comparisons do nothing other than reveal your own lack of credibility for all to see.
Its ok for you to just admit you were wrong.
so is Pirsig going to list his reasons for liking the caucus or what
Man Bernie supporters and the conspiracy theories. Pretty vile stuff.
Bernie is the dark stain on democracy that his cold socialist heart yearns for. Good stuff guys keep it up.
Pete now leading in total votes and delegates!
and why exactly would i do that in this space
https://apnews.com/5232ce5601996c1de440806ad30fa4fb
Rig: manage or conduct (something) fraudulently so as to produce a result or situation that is advantageous to a particular person.
Yes I watched it and I believe it. It's past incompetence at this point. It's been over 48 hours since the results should've come out. I tried to withhold judgment for as long as I could because it brings me no pleasure to criticize our institutions. It hurts whoever the nominee ends up being, and that only hurts our chances to defeat Trump. But defeating Trump is not the end-all, be-all if the institutions for picking our nominee is this incompetent, corrupt, rigged (pick your adjective).
First, the app malfunctions. Let's just call that gross incompetence and the McGowan-Halle ties just your everyday politics-as-usual corruption (which in a sane world would be talked about non-stop). Then the IDC decides to release an arbitrary 62%, and now 71% of the voter count, with zero transparency and what appears to be cherry-picking of the results (I'll attach the tweet). Then the DNC announces that it's "taking over" the accounting of the votes (link below). The same DNC that took $20 million from the Hillary campaign when it was $2 million in debt and gave her control over its operations in 2016? The same DNC that just changed the rules to allow Bloomberg on the debate stage after his $300k donation to the DNC? Come the fuck on.
Thank God the Sanders campaign had the foresight to ask their own volunteers to keep track of the results without telling the IDP or the DNC. My growing suspicion, as much as it pains me to say, is that the DNC and the IDP are either (1) intentionally delaying releasing the results at an arbitrary point to prop up Pete, or more cynically, are (2) trying to manipulate the results in a way that doesn't clash with the Sander's campaign's internal polling. Please provide me with a more logical or reasonable explanation at this point. I really would like to believe it's something else.
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/iowa-democratic-party-anticipates-releasing-majority-caucus-results/story?id=68744850
Not safe enough, huh