WindyCityDeac
Well-known member
Please tell me it’s Morgan & MorganJust ran an errand and had a bit of the FSU radio broadcast on. It was sponsored by the official law firm of FSU athletics. Wonder if said law firm is working the case.
Please tell me it’s Morgan & MorganJust ran an errand and had a bit of the FSU radio broadcast on. It was sponsored by the official law firm of FSU athletics. Wonder if said law firm is working the case.
For the PeopleFunny windy! I was going to say the same thing. Hahaha
For the People
I think that they deny that their legal staff and president were ever given the opportunity to review the GOR or the extension of it to 2036FSU crazies don't want to remember that their school legal staff had ample opportunity to review the GoR before the University President signed it for FSU. The attorneys could have objected at that time. Apparently they didn't.
Storing all copies at the ACC offices was also agreed to by all schools as an easy way to keep the agreement away from state FOIA requests.
Exactly!Then why did they agree to it?
Exactly!
But they don't see it that way. They see FSU as victims of the ACC leadership's behind closed door shenanigans. But they fail to see how stupid that makes them look.
Either they knowingly agreed to what they believed was a bad deal or they unknowingly agreed to a bad deal. Either way they look incompetent.
sure but their public bloviating is making it seem like they did one of the first two optionsThird option:
The FSU people thought it was a good deal when they signed the GoR, but now don't think it is.
sure but their public bloviating is making it seem like they did one of the first two options
because they areYup. And both positions make them sound stupid.
Twicked by those wiley, wascally lawyers from the ACC!sure but their public bloviating is making it seem like they did one of the first two options
Then their Board should sue them for gross negligence. Guarantee the GOR contains a provision stating they had the opportunity to review and consult with counsel (not that such a provision is necessary, particularly in an agreement of this significance).I think that they deny that their legal staff and president were ever given the opportunity to review the GOR or the extension of it to 2036
Then their Board should sue them for gross negligence. Guarantee the GOR contains a provision stating they had the opportunity to review and consult with counsel (not that such a provision is necessary, particularly in an agreement of this significance).