• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Conference Expansion: Stanford, California and SMU Join the ACC

I don’t know this guy at all but he seems relatively credible.

 
FSU crazies don't want to remember that their school legal staff had ample opportunity to review the GoR before the University President signed it for FSU. The attorneys could have objected at that time. Apparently they didn't.

Storing all copies at the ACC offices was also agreed to by all schools as an easy way to keep the agreement away from state FOIA requests.
 
Deaconblue said:
FSU crazies don't want to remember that their school legal staff had ample opportunity to review the GoR before the University President signed it for FSU. The attorneys could have objected at that time. Apparently they didn't.

Storing all copies at the ACC offices was also agreed to by all schools as an easy way to keep the agreement away from state FOIA requests.
Click to expand...
I think that they deny that their legal staff and president were ever given the opportunity to review the GOR or the extension of it to 2036
 
Then why did they agree to it?
 
PhDeac said:
Then why did they agree to it?
Click to expand...
Exactly!

But they don't see it that way. They see FSU as victims of the ACC leadership's behind closed door shenanigans. But they fail to see how stupid that makes them look.

Either they knowingly agreed to what they believed was a bad deal or they unknowingly agreed to a bad deal. Either way they look incompetent.
 
LilburnDeac said:
Exactly!

But they don't see it that way. They see FSU as victims of the ACC leadership's behind closed door shenanigans. But they fail to see how stupid that makes them look.

Either they knowingly agreed to what they believed was a bad deal or they unknowingly agreed to a bad deal. Either way they look incompetent.
Click to expand...

Third option:

The FSU people thought it was a good deal when they signed the GoR, but now don't think it is.
 
LilburnDeac said:
I think that they deny that their legal staff and president were ever given the opportunity to review the GOR or the extension of it to 2036
Click to expand...
Then their Board should sue them for gross negligence. Guarantee the GOR contains a provision stating they had the opportunity to review and consult with counsel (not that such a provision is necessary, particularly in an agreement of this significance).
 
deacz said:
Then their Board should sue them for gross negligence. Guarantee the GOR contains a provision stating they had the opportunity to review and consult with counsel (not that such a provision is necessary, particularly in an agreement of this significance).
Click to expand...

The conventional wisdom is that each school had a copy to review and a chunk of time to do that review. By the end of the review period, the school was supposed to either reject and propose changes or sign and return all copies. FSU obviously did the latter.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top