• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

Recent content by MysteryMen

  1. M

    WFU Hoops: '24-'25 Roster Construction Thread: (-) Carr, Monsanto, Ituka, Clark, Miller, Marsh, Keller, Canka / (+) Spillers, Biliew, Cosby

    The next shoe to drop is going to be when schools are allowed to pay the players, but now we can’t afford to have soccer and tennis teams because we have to use that money on football and basketball. People are going to hate that too. Pandora’s box has been opened, and we’re never coming back...
  2. M

    WFU Hoops: '24-'25 Roster Construction Thread: (-) Carr, Monsanto, Ituka, Clark, Miller, Marsh, Keller, Canka / (+) Spillers, Biliew, Cosby

    It’s not free market capitalism at all. It’s an artificial market because the most natural way for paying the players—out of the revenues they generate—is closed.
  3. M

    WFU Hoops: '24-'25 Roster Construction Thread: (-) Carr, Monsanto, Ituka, Clark, Miller, Marsh, Keller, Canka / (+) Spillers, Biliew, Cosby

    I think we can be critical of them given they’re now an integral player in putting a roster together. If Forbes said Carr was staying two weeks ago, only to turn around be like “lol jk”, I think it would be fair to wonder if he was on top of his shit. Given that RTQ is supposed to be putting...
  4. M

    WFU Hoops: '24-'25 Roster Construction Thread: (-) Carr, Monsanto, Ituka, Clark, Miller, Marsh, Keller, Canka / (+) Spillers, Biliew, Cosby

    I guess signing portal guys is like marrying someone who’s already cheated. If they’ve done it once, they’ll probably do it again
  5. M

    WFU Hoops: '24-'25 Roster Construction Thread: (-) Carr, Monsanto, Ituka, Clark, Miller, Marsh, Keller, Canka / (+) Spillers, Biliew, Cosby

    All of you who wanted to pay the players and get rid of transfer restrictions, congrats!
  6. M

    The RTQ Collective Thread

    If we are spending any significant amount of NIL money on WBB right now, we should stop. Because it’s not getting us anything
  7. M

    WFU Hoops: '24-'25 Roster Construction Thread: (-) Carr, Monsanto, Ituka, Clark, Miller, Marsh, Keller, Canka / (+) Spillers, Biliew, Cosby

    Really the courts have totally fucked college sports. Things were generally fine under the NCAA for decades before Brett Kavanaugh decided to get involved
  8. M

    WFU Hoops: '24-'25 Roster Construction Thread: (-) Carr, Monsanto, Ituka, Clark, Miller, Marsh, Keller, Canka / (+) Spillers, Biliew, Cosby

    Yeah, that’s the whole problem with NIL and why a lot of people argued very strongly against opening the door to it. It inevitably turns into pay-to-play
  9. M

    WFU Hoops: '24-'25 Roster Construction Thread: (-) Carr, Monsanto, Ituka, Clark, Miller, Marsh, Keller, Canka / (+) Spillers, Biliew, Cosby

    You’re not supposed to be paying their salaries though. You’re supposed to be compensating them for your use of their name, image, and likeness rights. Anyone feel like they’re getting their money’s worth in that regard?
  10. M

    WFU Hoops: '24-'25 Roster Construction Thread: (-) Carr, Monsanto, Ituka, Clark, Miller, Marsh, Keller, Canka / (+) Spillers, Biliew, Cosby

    I don’t have any current need for any athlete’s name, image, or likeness, so not sure what I’d be paying for
  11. M

    WFU Hoops: '24-'25 Roster Construction Thread: (-) Carr, Monsanto, Ituka, Clark, Miller, Marsh, Keller, Canka / (+) Spillers, Biliew, Cosby

    Welcome to the portal era! This is the logical conclusion of all the people moaning for years about transfer restrictions, and how XYZ player with a sob story wasn’t eligible to play immediately. Turns out those restrictions were pretty important to making this a fun sport to follow!
  12. M

    The Bubble

    Their “optics” are even worse than ours. They’ve lost 3 of their last 4 heading into the NCAA tournament—all of those losses coming to non-tournament teams (if Wake is not a tournament team), and they’ll be coming fresh off of a 20+ point loss to a horrible BC team
  13. M

    The Bubble

    You will never convince me that it makes sense that Clemson is a lock for a decent seed and Wake is out when Wake (1) finished ahead of Clemson in the ACC (at least on tiebreakers); (2) beat Clemson head-to-head; and (3) Clemson just lost three of four to non-tournament teams, including getting...
Back
Top