Newenglanddeac
Well-known member
- Joined
- May 1, 2011
- Messages
- 13,135
- Reaction score
- 390
That’s going to leave a mark.
I don't think the people who have been saying "Trump is great for the stock market" are going to care that all the 2018 gains have been wiped out.
I'm guessing they'll say the blue wave talk is scaring people and once people show their loyalty to Trump at the polls, the markets will be back.
I don't think the people who have been saying "Trump is great for the stock market" are going to care that all the 2018 gains have been wiped out.
I'm guessing they'll say the blue wave talk is scaring people and once people show their loyalty to Trump at the polls, the markets will be back.
Smart investors made money on the trump bump
How do you think the rube base did?
The rubes on the Tunnels Left? Not too well considering they likely went to cash in 2016 after reading Paul Krugman's article in the NYT predicting economic doomsday if Trump won the election.
That’s going to leave a mark.
Do media endorsements matter in general elections anymore?
What does "a hit dog will holler" refer to?
"the racists believe he's a racist" is a pretty sweet turn of phrase.
What does "a hit dog will holler" refer to?
The colloquialism is that howling about an issue too much is an exclamation of guilt (he doth protest too much) - i.e. the comments/punch landed, so there was a reaction - if it just missed it isn't mentioned.
I know I point this out all the time, but that's *not* what the whole "doth protest too much" means. Or should mean. I guess it's a "literally" or "irregardless" situation, and it can mean whatever you want it to mean.
The irony of its misuse in this context is that it is the person *saying* it that is actually the subject of the dramatic irony.
Closer. The irony is that the person calling out the overacting/insecurity is the guilty one, not the person doing the "protesting".Original meaning is just overacting/insincerity then?
Do media endorsements matter in general elections anymore?