Really? That’s the perfect confluence of mediocrity.
FWIW, I’d say:
1. 18 (including postseason).
2. Who the fuck knows given the turnover.
3. 1-2 wins less than #2.
4. 15.
5. 18-19. I won’t base it on wins but based on what the schedule looks like right now, I doubt he could hit the metrics that would satisfy me without getting 18-19 wins. Ultimately won’t matter unless he lands some of the big fish in the 2019 class.
6. 21+, with the same caveat as #5.
7. Same as 6.
8. Same as 6, except with more weight on the 2019 class and who’s coming back.
9. 20+ and T40 KP.