dartsndeacs
THE quintessential dwarf
If it's possible to get annoyed with Sister Jean's overexposure, it's possible to be annoyed with this Hogg kid. And I've heard neither of the two ever speak.
Weird take
Weird take
Jesus Christ dude, get it togetherOf course that was my point. It wasted the cache their gun control argument had built up with a small gripe about privacy.
Ok, I'll explain it since I like you, W&B, and didn't intend to be a dick (but then you didn't get it and then responded all hostile-like).
The discussion was about the Right's poor choice of words/metaphors when it comes to talking about the Parkland Shooting (e.g. "bulletproof", "target on their back"). Then you used the word "cache" twice in two posts, a word that is most commonly associated with a collecting and stashing of guns.
The word you were looking for is "cachet," which is a different word entirely. The fact that you used "cache" instead of "cachet" made it seem like you were purposely selecting the homophone with gun-related valences to make a dark joke. You weren't doing it intentionally, which was the basis for my joke. See, hilarious!
Ok, I'll explain it since I like you, W&B, and didn't intend to be a dick (but then you didn't get it and then responded all hostile-like).
The discussion was about the Right's poor choice of words/metaphors when it comes to talking about the Parkland Shooting (e.g. "bulletproof", "target on their back"). Then you used the word "cache" twice in two posts, a word that is most commonly associated with a collecting and stashing of guns.
The word you were looking for is "cachet," which is a different word entirely. The fact that you used "cache" instead of "cachet" made it seem like you were purposely selecting the homophone with gun-related valences to make a dark joke. You weren't doing it intentionally, which was the basis for my joke. See, hilarious!
Ok, I'll explain it since I like you, W&B, and didn't intend to be a dick (but then you didn't get it and then responded all hostile-like).
The discussion was about the Right's poor choice of words/metaphors when it comes to talking about the Parkland Shooting (e.g. "bulletproof", "target on their back"). Then you used the word "cache" twice in two posts, a word that is most commonly associated with a collecting and stashing of guns.
The word you were looking for is "cachet," which is a different word entirely. The fact that you used "cache" instead of "cachet" made it seem like you were purposely selecting the homophone with gun-related valences to make a dark joke. You weren't doing it intentionally, which was the basis for my joke. See, hilarious!
Of course it has other meanings. But that's why it was a joke! Because W&B was clearly not making a gun jokeIsn't it cache also the preferred term in IT/computers (which I believe is WakeandBake's field)? That's where my mind went, not guns.
Isn't it cache also the preferred term in IT/computers (which I believe is WakeandBake's field)? That's where my mind went, not guns.
well fuck. I'm an idiot. I thought I was using the correct spelling. apologies
Isn't it cache also the preferred term in IT/computers (which I believe is WakeandBake's field)? That's where my mind went, not guns.
I'm not sure I agree that that it's a bad idea to bring up how ridiculous an idea it is to make the students use clear backpacks as a way to deter gun violence. The whole point of the greater movement is to point out that the GOP thinks that the 2nd Amendment is all-powerful and would rather take away other constitutionally guaranteed rights over enacting common sense gun control that doesn't violate any constitutional rights. This seems to be an on-point example of that.
The GOP always likes to bring up that it's a slippery slope and that enacting simple gun control measures will mean that soon enough, liberals will try to take away all conservatives' guns. Here, we actually have an example of a right potentially being infringed (not hypothetically, like with guns), and it's not a far leap of logic to think that more rights could be if it means "saving" people's guns. The NRA's rhetoric recently is already character assassination and intimidation to inhibit free speech, only a matter of time before the GOP Congress tries to hop on board.