yes, last one had realignment optionPretty sure you could change conferences on an older edition of the game.
Yea but could you virtually raise $500M+ in capital to do so? That’s where the entertainment value lies.Pretty sure you could change conferences on an older edition of the game.
Petrino also unlocks sex mode?I want an option where you can hire a nice gentleman like Ron Wellman or a total sleeze ball like Bobby Petrino. Wellman hire lets you keep your 2 star recruits until they graduate, finish 7-5 every fourth year and never have any classroom issues due to great culture. Petrino hire lands you 5 star recruits only for a season, win a natty in year 2, but forfeit the natty 7 years later because you lured those 5 star kids with hookers and blow. It's like GTAV, but for football.
If you can successfully complete the motorcycle infidelity challenge.Petrino also unlocks sex mode?
Because that'll make everyone forget it and the heat won't be on Blue Bloods Bias or whatever spam account made the claimwhy wait a couple weeks
He almost lost me at the comment about Clemson's success in basketball, but overall sounds reasonable. He also had me worried when listing the "Carolina schools including Duke" as not including Wake, but then he LOWF'd us in as a sub-category of Carolina schools so I guess we're o.k. with that.This is the most realistic article I’ve seen on the ACC and one which I’d honestly be fine with and I still think it is overplaying what will happen. I don’t think Miami and GT make sense to leave.
https://sports.yahoo.com/conference-expansion-five-bold-predictions-210519196.html
If the 6 NC and VA schools come out of this together then I think I’m fine with whatever else happens.He almost lost me at the comment about Clemson's success in basketball, but overall sounds reasonable. He also had me worried when listing the "Carolina schools including Duke" as not including Wake, but then he LOWF'd us in as a sub-category of Carolina schools so I guess we're o.k. with that.
Because it is bullshitwhy wait a couple weeks
I like his idea that the only conference that would want FSU is the B-12, but is the B-12's TV contract that much better than the ACC's? I don't agree with him about Miami. Residents of the Miami area do not support UofMiami, so no it really does little for that TV market. I can see the potential interest of Clemson to the B1G just to gain the SC market with a quality football team. But I still think the only real apple to the SEC's and maybe the B1G's eyes would be UNC.He almost lost me at the comment about Clemson's success in basketball, but overall sounds reasonable. He also had me worried when listing the "Carolina schools including Duke" as not including Wake, but then he LOWF'd us in as a sub-category of Carolina schools so I guess we're o.k. with that.
What are your thoughts on GT? Do we honestly believe the Atlanta TV market makes it worthwhile? If so, then you may as well just invite Georgia State.I like his idea that the only conference that would want FSU is the B-12, but is the B-12's TV contract that much better than the ACC's? I don't agree with him about Miami. Residents of the Miami area do not support UofMiami, so no it really does little for that TV market. I can see the potential interest of Clemson to the B1G just to gain the SC market with a quality football team. But I still think the only real apple to the SEC's and maybe the B1G's eyes would be UNC.
and every media market has access to every team alreadyI thought we were past the whole "add a school to gain a media market" thing, particularly with the number of cable subscribers continuing to steadily decline.
I actually think that nothing much will come of it either way. FSU will end up with some egg on their face, but both sides will agree to go back to the status quo after FSU realizes that they don't have an out of the GoR or a place to land that is any better than what they have now.I really think FSU has made a huge blunder in suing the ACC and will come to regret it big time