Seems like the conferences are still trying to figure out what the Alliance actually will mean for individual schools. At this time, the primary benefit of the "alliance" is that it's based on the ACC, Big 10 and Pac-12 staying in tact.
If you read this thread from the beginning, when the news dribbled out about OK and TX leaving for the SEC, some immediately predicted that Clemson, UNC, UVA, FSU would follow suit; same for USC, UCLA and Oregon and that there would be a single super-conference with the SEC at the core that would relegate WF to the Magnolia League or the Southern Conference status (so predictable that whenever there is any realignment that a large segment of our fanbase thinks WF will be kicked to the curb). While there are key differences between the flimsy ties that schools have to the Big 12, and the 2036 grant of rights deal that binds all ACC schools, the concern loomed that the ACC would crater at some point in the future. We shall see what this new Alliance really means, but at a minimum, it looks like the member schools in the ACC, Big 10 and Pac 12 remain committed to their conference, and these schools want to work collectively to find a way to use the Alliance to leverage bigger payouts and to stem the influence of the SEC over the future of college athletics. Agree that how well all of this works remains to seen, and the SEC will continue as a force particularly in college football, but the Alliance is as good of an initial step as WF could expect in response to what appears to be the end of the Big 12.
Interesting to note that this Alliance really leaves the remaining eight Big 12 schools in survival mode.