No.
The misguided loyalty that allows a journeyman coach no one ever heard of before he was hired to become the proxy for the basketball program does.
As does apathy.
Without getting into Buzz's merits....
I am intrigued by the amount of effort some devote to defending him. His defense has become, intentionally or not, more of a focus than the state of the program as a whole. That is very odd, and I wish I knew more about the social and affinity dynamics behind this. I suspect they are not limited to this example.
Imagine for a moment that we had hired the hottest coach in the world. Coach Awesome. I would have been really happy about that. Imagine that coach Awesome then had a horrible record and came across as overwhelmed and prickly. I don't think I'd spend one minute defending the guy. I think I'd be unhappy that we were losing to Southern Conference teams. I want WFU win. I don't care about the coach. He is just a steward for the thing I (historically) care about.
Regardless of who coaches WFU basketball and regardless of who is on the roster, the current situation, overall and game to game, is absurd and should make anyone angry.
When you feel anger is pointless, you become apathetic.
That's why I don't care all that much about WFU basketball at the moment.