• Welcome to OGBoards 10.0, keep in mind that we will be making LOTS of changes to smooth out the experience here and make it as close as possible functionally to the old software, but feel free to drop suggestions or requests in the Tech Support subforum!

MBB Game 3: Utah Utes - Thursday 9 pm - Charleston Classic Quarter-Final ESPNU

he's not Monsanto yet, but there were a few instances last night when his feet were set, we got penetration creating some space, and I wanted the ball to be kicked out to him. I'll take my chances with him shooting in that scenario. And when we run across the next 1-3-1 look...please let Parker touch the ball.
Monsanto, Parker, along with Sallis, Boopie and Cam should make that 1-3-1 zone a recipe for disaster for opponents soon. However, right now Monsanto is injured and our and Friedrichsen is still learning how he fits in and earning the coaches trust.
 
Agree with this —Monsanto is becoming more and more of a legend the longer he is off the floor. We were often better last year when he was not on the floor— depended on the matchups. One thing for sure is that he has to be covered , so it opens up things for other shooters.
Monsanto was putting up threes at a higher volume and higher shooting percentage than anyone since JJ Redick so no.
 
I expect him to fire 3s without hesitation from all over the court and hit roughly 40% of them. Anything else would be a bonus.

Love Parker as a shooter, but he's not Monsanto (yet).
He plays way better man defense than Monsanto does tho
 
Agree with this —Monsanto is becoming more and more of a legend the longer he is off the floor. We were often better last year when he was not on the floor— depended on the matchups. One thing for sure is that he has to be covered , so it opens up things for other shooters.
No. Wake was at no point better without a 40% three point shooter with a 111 offensive efficiency on 23% usage on the floor. This is beyond dumb
 
Last edited:
Agree with this —Monsanto is becoming more and more of a legend the longer he is off the floor. We were often better last year when he was not on the floor— depended on the matchups. One thing for sure is that he has to be covered , so it opens up things for other shooters.
yeah, no. While prone to attention lapses at times, he was a decent defender, good+ rebounder, and his offensive production (especially adding the mid-range game last year) was a definite benefit.
 
On the night of February 22nd, WF was 17-10 overall and was down 2 in the final minute of the first half at NC State. Damari had 9 points (of course on 3 of 4 threes) at that point of the game, and WF had a glimmer of a chance at a post-season bid.

Monsanto went down, and NC State dominated the rest of the way winning 90-74. The Deacs stumbled to the finish, including losing at home to a bad BC team. Deacs didn't even sniff an NIT bid. Nothing better than watching Damari feeling it and jacking without no conscience. Dude is 6-6 and has elite NBA range, and that is the present and future of basketball. WF will never be better without Damari. Never ever.

FWIW, only Klintman and Marsh had a better rebound rate than Monsanto; he also had the 2nd lowest TO rate on the team.
 
yeah, no. While prone to attention lapses at times, he was a decent defender, good+ rebounder, and his offensive production (especially adding the mid-range game last year) was a definite benefit.
Monsanto had to be guarded anywhere he was in the front court. Left unguarded he was better than 50% shooting. That meant also that his defender couldn't leave him to double elsewhere without a big risk of Wak scoring.
 
Wake could have used Chas delivering 5 solid fouls playing in the post last night. He might have dissuaded Utah from a few of those dunks.
 
What we're doing wrong is failing to acknowledge that sports in 2023 means that you have to assume at least 25% of your players are going to be out "injured" at any point in time, and have the depth to backfill. "Well when we get _______ back" is code for our team sucks. Whether pro or college, players play much less now than they used to. Whether or not it is being overly cautious, it is reality. One guy comes back, another guy goes out. The good teams anticipate it and overcome it. The bad teams wait for ______ to come back.
I think we all acknowledge that we are still rebuilding and are generally not as deep as others , especially in the front court. having 2 7-foot guys out at our weakest spot is a tall task for any team. the fact that we have 2 freshmen that have and will continue to see significant minutes is all you really need to know. And if we had 13 healthy/eligible scholly players that would not be the case. I am concerned about our injuries generally over the last 3 seasons. i dont have any data, but they seem outsized relative. having 3 guys down in November is ALOT. Monsanto has missed a significant portion of 3 seasons, Ituka has not played a healthy reg season game yet. Marsh is on concussion #2 in a little more than 2.5 years. Cam and Hunter, it is rumored, are already banged up and yet still very effective. you expect this sort of thing by feb/march, not November. We're doing something wrong.
 
The silver lining is that if Marsh hadn't gotten dinged and Efton placed in purgatory, there is no way Keller gets meaningful minutes last night. Hope the short term pain leads to long-term gain.
I think with everyone healthy we will be a good team. Keller is decent but still young and a bit slow. Marsh would have helped at the very least picking up a few of Carson's fouls and perhaps fended off a few dunks. . When Carson went out that hurt big time. Despite the size difference we played with them all game.
 
Utah giving #6 Houston a battle. 21-20. So, it's not like we lost to a shit team
 
What we're doing wrong is failing to acknowledge that sports in 2023 means that you have to assume at least 25% of your players are going to be out "injured" at any point in time, and have the depth to backfill. "Well when we get _______ back" is code for our team sucks. Whether pro or college, players play much less now than they used to. Whether or not it is being overly cautious, it is reality. One guy comes back, another guy goes out. The good teams anticipate it and overcome it. The bad teams wait for ______ to come back.
Probably only 5 percent though if they were wearing the right shoes for the turf though.
 
Back
Top