Where are you guys at on the governing bodies dialing back the equipment for the pros? Personally I don't like that. Part of what it cool about golf is you can go out and play with the same stuff the pros play with if you want to, although often ill-fitting for the handicap golfer. If they were made to use balls that were 75 percent limited flight or drivers that were limited to 300cc's it would just water it down to me. I want to see what these guys can do with the latest and greatest equipment that falls under the USGA and R&A rules for everybody. Now, I do want to see these guys challenged at times. It's ok to have tournaments where they're destroying par, but it's also good to see them challenged to shoot under par for 4 days. I don't think it's feasible to start building or lengthening courses to 8000+ yards, so I'd like to see them significantly toughen select courses. Narrow the fairways and lengthen the rough to challenge these guys to really think about the strategy of hitting it as far as possible because you'd rather have a wedge from the rough, than a 7 iron from the fairway. If you lengthen the rough enough, a 100 yard sand wedge from the rough is harder than a 7 iron from the fairway. I think right now there isn't a big distinction between risk and reward off the tee in most cases. If DeShamblow is having to decide whether to hit driver 360 yards with a good chance of having a sand wedge out of 6 inch rough, as opposed to hitting a long iron and having an 8 iron from the fairway, I think it would be a much harder decision.