OldGouldandBlack
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2011
- Messages
- 4,172
- Reaction score
- 2,763
Yeah, 50 would have been my max for Mount, I think. 50+5 seems entirely reasonable, I guess. Pressure's on them.
Mount is 24 and almost certainly not interested in going to Saudi Arabia. United is the only team bidding for him. ETH clearly really wants Mount signed and ready for preseason because there is no other explanation for United's continued bidding against itself for a guy who wants to leave and has only one year left on his contract.Chelsea now have all the leverage in the world with negotiations like this because they can just be like fine, we’ll always field offers from the Saudi royal family
that is the only thing keeping me from lamenting this transfer even more. If Erik wants the player that badly then I know he has to have a plan for him.Mount is 24 and almost certainly not interested in going to Saudi Arabia. United is the only team bidding for him. ETH clearly really wants Mount signed and ready for preseason because there is no other explanation for United's continued bidding against itself for a guy who wants to leave and has only one year left on his contract.
Is Chelsea going to have anyone in their squad once their preseason training starts?Bournemouth sign Justin Kluivert from Roma
he would not be playing in the top leagues if he had a different last name
-----
transfers coming thick and fast now!
Azpilicueta and Marcus Thuram heading to Inter. Chelsea agreed to terminate Azpi's contract so that the move could be done without a transfer fee.
Far betterNow I'm confused. Man United reportedly in talks with Rabiot about a free transfer. If United are wanting to sign him...then why pay 50+ mil for Mount?
Could be a smokescreen. Could be a case of pushing Chelsea into accepting the latest bid.
Rabiot is a better player than Mount anyway, IMO.
What we are hearing: United have lodged a third bid for Chelsea midfielder Mount worth up to £55 million after their opening two offers were rejected. They are prepared to offer Harry Maguire and/or Scott McTominay plus cash for Rice but City and Arsenal are frontrunners.
I'll just say that West Ham will have to reinvest the Rice money back into the squad anyway, so a part exchange isn't a bad approach to take.The transfers each Premier League club needs – and what we are hearing
The transfer window is open and the race is on for every Premier League club to add or, in some cases, cut from their squadwww.telegraph.co.uk
View attachment 4098
Yes. Phenomenal player.should I be happy to have Gundogan?
Yeah but why take on someone else's deadwood on likely way overpriced contracts when you could take the 100M and waste it on other players like Tottenham did with the Bale moneyI'll just say that West Ham will have to reinvest the Rice money back into the squad anyway, so a part exchange isn't a bad approach to take.
If signing Eriksen for 11.5 million was a waste I'd really like the club to get back to wasting money like that!Yeah but why take on someone else's deadwood on likely way overpriced contracts when you could take the 100M and waste it on other players like Tottenham did with the Bale money
Bayern Munich have reportedly bid 70 mil plus add ons for Kane
That's gotta be tempting to Levy if Kane has really said he won't be signing a new contract