bym051d
I AM VERY IMPORTANT
- Joined
- Mar 16, 2011
- Messages
- 39,506
- Reaction score
- 5,352
Thank you Mr. Trump. I will think about it.
Listening to Donald over Bernie means you were never really with Bernie.
Thank you Mr. Trump. I will think about it.
How about we make community colleges and two-year "craft" schools, and then actually foster people that want to do that in middle school and high school. Not everybody needs/wants/should go to a 4-year school.
How about we make community colleges and two-year "craft" schools, and then actually foster people that want to do that in middle school and high school. Not everybody needs/wants/should go to a 4-year school.
Listening to Donald over Bernie means you were never really with Bernie.
Wasn't that pretty much Clinton's initial proposal?
That was an Obama proposal but the pay-for was axing 529s, so....
How about we make community colleges and two-year "craft" schools, and then actually foster people that want to do that in middle school and high school. Not everybody needs/wants/should go to a 4-year school.
The counter to that is the government already subsidizes 12 years of "free" education. Why extend it 2 or 4 more years?
The counter to that is the government already subsidizes 12 years of "free" education. Why extend it 2 or 4 more years?
How about we make community colleges and two-year "craft" schools, and then actually foster people that want to do that in middle school and high school. Not everybody needs/wants/should go to a 4-year school.
Because knowledge is good?
Listening to Donald over Bernie means you were never really with Bernie.
You're implying that opposing this is to oppose knowledge?
How about we just offer subsidized education for as many years as people would like? After all, knowledge is good.
I'm not a "bootstraps" guy, but at a certain point you've been given enough free education and need to obtain more "knowledge" at your own expense instead of at everyone else's.
That said, I think we need to dramatically shift our current education system towards STEM with more rigorous classes and year round schooling.
Or maybe you just pay more attention to their economic agendas than their social agendas. They share a fair amount economically but are diametrically opposed socially.
So Trump's gonna raise taxes on the rich/corporations and generate money from Wall Street speculation?
The counter to that is the government already subsidizes 12 years of "free" education. Why extend it 2 or 4 more years?
You're implying that opposing this is to oppose knowledge?
How about we just offer subsidized education for as many years as people would like? After all, knowledge is good.
I'm not a "bootstraps" guy, but at a certain point you've been given enough free education and need to obtain more "knowledge" at your own expense instead of at everyone else's.
That said, I think we need to dramatically shift our current education system towards STEM with more rigorous classes and year round schooling.
I don't think opposition to the different free college proposals is the same as opposing knowledge.
For autodidacts, education is basically subsidized for life already.
Anyways, I'm just offering one simple reason why a state might offer tuition-free higher ed.
I'm all for making high schools more responsive so more students can get jobs straight out of high school.
On the other hand, I can understand why someone may need more years of schooling in 2017 than my classmates did over 20 years ago to get just as far in an everchanging world.[/QUOTE]
And, obviously, the taxpayers are who should fund all of this. PH & the Democrats are big on using OPM to fund all of their pet projects.
How is the state of California's financial situation doing these days?