Mayor Cheat gets more votes than reported from the ground. Sanders gets way less votes than reported. Devel Patrick (who?) gets 7.3%.
Tell me again how this thing isn't rigged.
It seems like it is Bernie's goal to foster the BSF4L/Section2 thinking that is tearing the Democratic party in two. He's like a 2 sociopathic 2 year old in that if he doesn't get his way he would rather burn it all to the ground.lol ok
Sorry we won’t get to hear a defense of the system now that 3 people pushed back
Mayor Cheat gets more votes than reported from the ground. Sanders gets way less votes than reported. Devel Patrick (who?) gets 7.3%.
Tell me again how this thing isn't rigged.
It could be that the evil Dems are rigging this even though there is a clear paper trail outside their control that would quickly prove their cheating. OR, this could have been a data entry mistake that they've already corrected. Which do you think is more likely?
"Let me be clear: My number one priority has been on ensuring the accuracy and integrity of the results," Price said as reporters crowded around the staging where he spoke. "And we have been working all night to be in the best position to report results."
It seems like it is Bernie's goal to foster the BSF4L/Section2 thinking that is tearing the Democratic party in two. He's like a 2 sociopathic 2 year old in that if he doesn't get his way he would rather burn it all to the ground.
There is a reason why the conspiracy theories come from his camp and not the rest of the party.
Also #MayorCheat #MayoPete are all being propagated by Russian bots, throw back to 2016 when the Russians were also feeling the bern.
I offered responses to those criticisms, though, ITC. What's your beef, dude?
here's what I don't know/understand: if I am a supporter of candidate X and live in a rural area where they do not get 15% in the first round, then I have to choose a different candidate to support thereafter, but if I live in an urban area and they do get 15% then my vote for them counts toward delegates
do I have that right? if so, seems weird
Iowa could not have pick a worse time to fuck up. We need to send their state back to irrelevance.
I think a great place for the primaries to start would be in South Carolina. SC has a nice cross section of the American demographic within the party base, and it would be nice to give the state and the south representation in the party that they normally lack. Instead of just letting a bunch of white people keep controlling the party.
Oh and just so we are clear, their chart shows why the South shouldn't get first dibs on primaries. Outside of FL (which is just a bunch of transplants anyway), those states are less representative of the country than even IA.
Yet, North Carolina is #5 !