Search results

:bowrofl:

this is nuts. get back on topic.

how do you sign Danny Manning for billions but balk at Beilein's ask? That's like CV19 math... it doesn't make sense...

RJ barely remembers the three times we've had exchanges, so I'm good. (plus I'm a world-class lurker not prone to contributing).

a fucking travesty

Tried to pos, but apparently I need to spread some around first

Despite my lack of qualifications to carry your laptop bag, allow me to correct your sentence. In my lifetime, Democrats have increasingly belittled and insulted the intelligence and capabilities of every R pres from Reagan, forward.

Hey... thanks for a non-snarky response. I get that.. my intent wasn't to assert the Garland block was Constitutional.. rather it was to acknowledge I'm out of my depth on 'law' questions, so I have to rely on SCOTUS' addressing something before I can even start to form an opinion. I don't...

why? in my limited (wholly uneducated) view, if a question of Constitutionality is on the table, who better to address it than SCOTUS?

our friend Chris believes they closed it ... despite having nothing to hide ... due to the potential perception they had something to hide... i guess they were influenced by the right wing propaganda rags. why do you believe they closed it? they raked in tons of pledges.. actually collected...

so good faith question.. where do funds for administrative overhead come from (staffed by friends / family / associates / plus let's not forget travel)? they do an annual bake sale or what?

I run a company. I can't spell 'law', but if pressed I'd defer to SCOTUS. Have they ruled on the delay? If not, why not?

the conclusions I drew was that she sold access as SecState.. *shrug* .. maybe they're bright enough to not sell access when she's pres.. i dunno... hey friend, what's the left wing narrative on why they closed it down? all of god's work that they were doing was finished?

I can't speak for the other posters, but my post was a response to one of your guys trying to hang a halo on the Clintons wrt their handling of US interests.. it was an easy shot, so I took it... sue me... As for Trump.. let him burn... my vote for Gorsuch is already locked in.. so the mob can...

In addition to Bloomberg, I can cite the NYT as well.. another infamous right wing propaganda rag....

From Bloomberg.. I'm interpreting "CGI ends run" as CGI ends run: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-09-19/clinton-global-initiative-ends-run-with-some-of-shine-worn-off

ha ha... what does my being brainwashed by the WSJ (get it straight.. I don't watch Fox) have to do with all the various entities -- domestic *AND* non-domestic -- that pulled their pledges to CGI after Ms. Clinton lost the election? CGI died because access was cut off when Ms. Clinton went...

Hey man.. I'm not bright enough to follow long sentences.. but I didn't bring up Ms. Clinton.. I was addressing ChrisL's commentary on Bill and Hillary and US interests.. by noting a real world example of how Bill and Hillary handle US interests... don't kill the messenger, friend.

How's the Clinton Foundation / Clinton Global Initiative doing these days? Firm financial footing, I'm sure..

second this. imo, if it isn't reported by the Wall Street Journal, New York Times or NPR, it didn't happen.