I voted no. If Buzz is gone after this year, we can debate what was or will be the lowest point of this first three years. But absolute rock bottom will be if the administration allows Buzz to stay. Three more years of knowing that we have this ridiculously sub-standard coach; that would be rock bottom. Condemned to Mediocrity = Rock Bottom
I agree with this statement based on the following. From the 90/91 season through 05/06 season we made either the NCAA Tourney or NIT every year. Within those years, WFU started with at least 1 NCAA Tourney game in 6 out of 7 years, including 2 Sweet 16's and 1 Elite 8. Also, during the same time period we finished ranked in the Top 25 four times, #16 in 93 #3 in 95 #9 in both 96 and 97. Towards the end of the Odom Era, we at least went to the NIT every year, won at least 1 game, and won the NIT in 99/00. Under Odom, our worst year was 17-14 overall, and he never finished with a conference record lower than 7-9.
Under Skip and before CP3 left 1 year prematurely, for 5 seasons we went to the NCAA Tourney every year and won at least 1 game, including 1 Sweet 16 appearance. Also, Skip never finished with a 9-7 conference record and never below 3rd place, and we finished ranked in the Top 25 4 out of 5 years, #23 in 01, #8 in 03, #17 in 04, and #5 in 05. Granted, Skip's Teams massively underachieved in the both the ACC and NCAA Tournaments, but at least his worst record during this 5 year span was 21-13.
Then, CP3 left a year earlier than expected, and we finished 1 game below .500 for the first time since the 89/90 season. However, we were able to rebuild very quickly, and was back in the NCAA Tourney 2 years later under Dino, including being ranked #1 in the polls during the same season. The following season we were back to winning NCAA Tournament games again, and had a Top 15 recruiting class coming in with 2 talented players returning. Also, we finished ranked #12 in 08 and we were ranked #22 in 09 going into March. Even though there were 2 seasons when we finished at the bottom of the ACC, there was a valid reason and you could tell that this team would be back to a Top 25 Program on a regular basis.
In summary, during 20 seasons before Bz, we went to either the NCAA Tourney or NIT 18 out of 20 seasons and won at least 1 game 14 out of 18 times(If CP3 did not leave 1 year yearly, then I doubt we ever miss the post season), finished ranked in the Top 25 9 times (However, we were ranked in the Top 25 for at least 1 week 16 of 20 seasons), 3 Sweet 16s, 1 Elite 8, 1 NIT Championship, 2 ACC Tournament Titles and 1 Regular Season Outright ACC Title and Tied for 1st in 94/95, had 3 players win ACC Player of the Year (Rogers, Duncan (twice), Howard), etc etc. Also, from 90/91 until 05/06 we had the longest postseason streak of any team in the ACC. Finally, we finished no less than 3rd in the ACC 11 times, and only finished below 4th in the ACC 3 times during this stretch (not counting 05/06 and 06/07) with a conference record of 7-9 each (5th in 99/00 and 00/01 and 7th in 07/08)
Under Bz's first two seasons there have been more players to transfer than ACC Conference wins. He was not just bad, but historically bad, with a 15% conference record and only 1 road win in 2 seasons . Also, iIn 10/11 no other team from a Power Conference finished below us in the Ken Pom rankings at 251, and only 2 teams finished below us in 11/12 at 211, BC and Southern Cal. Granted, he has gotten off to a decent start this season during conference play, but if we did not have CJ, then how many of those games would we have won? Also, we use to always play a tough out of conference schedule every year under Odom, Skip, and Dino playing mid majors such as Gonzaga, Temple, Utah, Xavier, Cincy, etc, and we would also play 2 or 3 teams (outside of the Big 10 ACC Challenge) from other Power Conferences. Now, we have a terrible non conference schedule, and only play a team from a Power Conference because we are forced to along with Xavier. There have been numerous articles written by the national media on both ESPN and CBS.Sportsline describing how fall we have fallen so quickly.
The problem is that I have yet to see any improvement in our players during this tenure. Personally, I believe that coaching in college is a major factor in why teams win. Honestly, why is Duke, Carolina, Syracuse, Kansas, Michigan St, UConn, and Caliperia's teams at Memphis and Kentucky always good when they constantly turn players over? Coaching, coaching is the constant in college basketball that makes teams into programs, and thus competitive. Also, those teams always embody the identity of their coach, and I guarantee you if there was a game were the teams wore no jersey's and one of those coaches had his team at the game, then you would have no problem identifying which coach it was due to the team's style of play
If our measure of success at WFU under BZ is making the NIT every year, or the NCAA every few years, then we will be living at rock bottom until he is gone(I doubt that there could be any coach worse than him). Under Bz do you honestly expect us to be a Top 25 Team 4 out of 5 years? More likely, we would be ranked for at least 1 week in the Top 25 1 out 5 years, if we are lucky. My point is that once we become irrelevant, it will be that much harder to become not only relevant again, but a Top 25 Program. Honestly, I would rather experience the heartbreaking losses in the NCAA Tourney by Oklahoma St in the Sweet 16, Cleveland St in the 1st round, or Standford, Auburn, and West Virgina in the 2nd round of the NCAA Tourney compared to barely making the NCAA Tourney as a 10 seed once in a blue moon. At least then we experienced 4 months of exciting regular season play.