inspectah_
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2023
- Messages
- 306
- Reaction score
- 325
yeah but Buddy Izzo just scored his first basket so good for him/themPlease explain Michigan State's NET ranking to me. They have one blowout win against #9 Baylor (88-66 - H) and lost to James Madison (H), Duke (N), Arizona (N), Wisconsin (H), Nebraska (A), Northwestern (A), Illinois (A). It is one thing to get credit for playing good teams, but don't you actually need to win some of these games?
the eternally 17-13 tourney teamMichigan State is probably a good example of a team that will be good in the NET, but not viewed as favorably by the committee because of their Q1 record come Selection Sunday.
This is the type of post that just doesn't make sense to me logically. We are not required to go 2-2 against @UNC /@ Duke/@NCSU/Duke in order to make the tournament. In fact, we could lose all 4 of those games and still likely make the tournament if we went 10-1 or 11-0 in the other ACC games.Unless we get two of three from @UNC/@Duke/Duke, which is unlikely, must-win if we want an NCAA berth.
Unless we get two of three from @UNC/@Duke/Duke, which is unlikely, must-win if we want an NCAA berth.
NO PROBLEMTHANKS FOR LETTING US KNOW
I get that. I'm just shooting the shit, not trying to analyze this scientifically. I'll leave that to the usual suspects. Just seems like unless we spring a couple of big upsets somewhere we really need this game against a team in pretty direct competition with us for a top-quarter finish in the league.This is the type of post that just doesn't make sense to me logically. We are not required to go 2-2 against @UNC /@ Duke/@NCSU/Duke in order to make the tournament. In fact, we could lose all 4 of those games and still likely make the tournament if we went 10-1 or 11-0 in the other ACC games.
Games like today are critically important in order to make the NCAAs, yes. But similar opportunities exist on our schedule including @Pitt and @UVA, and we don't have to win every one of those games to have a chance. Losing today's just increases the importance of winning the next one.
I get that. I'm just shooting the shit, not trying to analyze this scientifically.
FSU similar situationDuke will be a Q1 home opportunity guaranteed. And yeah Clemson really the only other option for that. Major issue the ACC keeps having.
Another is that Notre Dame was absolutely horrible to start the year and is now the 6th best team in the ACC since Christmas. That shit can't happen for our bubble teams. Gotta take care of business against GT, Louisville, ND - especially at home.
“must win” is pretty vague - to be specific, the tournament selection criteria doesn’t really allow teams to “turn it around” at the end of the year anymore. If Wake isn’t a tournament level team in January then we very likely won’t be in March either. So consider ACC win #5 as meaningful as win #14 and then decide for yourself if it’s a “must win”.I understand the inclination, but I think we need to stop declaring that each game is a "must-win" in terms of our NCAAT chances. We've done that for probably every ACC game so far.
Yes every game is important to our resume, including tonight. But we aren't dead in the water if we lose tonight.
CC Harrison and Jeremy Hyatt are on warning too.I hope we beat them so bad that gap tooth son of a bitch Marcus Melvin wakes up with a headache tomorrow.