Australians are required to vote. I think you pay a fine if you don't.
Record turnout in Wisconsin, still couldn't get rid of Scott Walker...if he was better looking, he'd be a lock for President.
He's better looking than Christie and Rand Paul. That may be all that matters.
The last bar graph literally had a link that provided where the data came from and was deemed insufficient because the image provided was a picture of the graph rather than an interactive one from the website. You just had to go to the actual website and look at where the data came from but opted to not even do that because it was "Tuffalo's 'argument'" not your own. I don't even care about this specific argument, but please excuse PH for not wanting to post any more information when we've a) had this discussion so many times in the past with evidence presented from both sides where everyone knows what the facts are and b) you aren't even interested enough in engaging beyond the confines of this message board to go get the information directly off a graphic that provides data and presumably provides information on the methodology behind the data.
You still don't understand that the data in the bar graph is not actually attainable under the law, do you? Putting aside the fact that I've never seen it measured, they can't measure it, since to do so would be illegal in our State (you can't bring a recording device into a polling place, even if you wanted to).
I could post a bar graph about the number of times a day your mother thinks about me, then post the supporting data on a website, and my "data" would have survived all of the scrutiny you can muster for this study whose self-serving conclusions you agree with.
Poll?
Paul, Walker, or Christie -- who ya got?
Yeah too bad they can't just ask people how long they waited. Also, like Tuffalo, I haven't said anything about the chart nor any conclusions which can be derived from the chart. I was just pointing out that the data is readily available for you to go look at if you wanted to. Of course we all know that you don't want to and aren't going to, which was my entire point.
Oh, stated wait times? Is that as reliable as stated income? Seems legit. What could go wrong?
HOLY FUCKING SHIT I FOUND THE ANSWER!
"Relying on responses to the 2008 and 2012 CCES, the following table reports the distribution of responses to the question, “Approximately, how long did you have to wait in line to vote?”
Shockingly, the information appears to be obtained by.....asking people how long they waited to vote. God I hope that's a way that "data in the bar graph [was] attain[ed] under the law."
HOLY HELL!
Does jhmd really believe that you can't depend on American voters to be truthful?