Wakelaw2006
Well-known member
I thought it was given that Jameis had sex with the accuser.
The first talking points were that he didn't match the description of the accused, so I don't think anyone was taking it as a given that he had sex with the accuser. This doesn't prove he assaulted her, but it seems to take the "it wasn't me" defense off the table and make the case solely a case of whether it was consensual (unless there is another person involved as well). Who knows what the supposedly exculpatory affidavits his defense counsel mentioned said - they could have been from witnesses who saw it and said it was consensual - I just don't think we know at this point.
Last edited: