ImTheCaptain
I disagree with you
so, the movie where the partisans are all killed and memorialized with a tiny plaque no one ever visits (according to the movie)
so, the movie where the partisans are all killed and memorialized with a tiny plaque no one ever visits (according to the movie)
That's just hollywood dramatizing the events
In all seriousness, I said that on the unpopular opinions thread, but it was primarily for the shock effect. I'm fine with the Second Amendment/having a gun for personal protection.
I do think that there needs to be much, much more stringent gun laws, with harsher penalties if your gun winds up in the hands of somebody that shouldn't have it. Stricter penalties for folks who aren't licensed to carry guns, and extensive background checks for anybody wishing to carry a gun.
I never plan on owning a gun nor do I really see the need for it where I live, but clearly we have established I am in a bubble more than most. If peeps feel the need for guns then all the more power to them. I believe they make society a more dangerous place than a safe place.
Require gun owners to carry insurance. Yes, I know it would be an assault on the 2nd amendment, but it would be the ultimate solution.
We use AR-15s often to kill wild hogs. They are a massive nuisance with incredible reproductive skills. You have to kill 70% of the population just to stay even.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Why would having insurance be an "assault on the 2nd Amendment"? You can still keep and bear arms.
You're requiring gun owners to pay an annual fee for a Constitutional right.
You're requiring gun owners to pay an annual fee for a Constitutional right.
Because they have a liability price. Plus even Scalia said there can be regulation of the 2nd Amendment.
None of our Bill of Rights are limitless and without regulation.
Almost like requiring people to buy an ID to vote?
Because they have a liability price. Plus even Scalia said there can be regulation of the 2nd Amendment.
None of our Bill of Rights are limitless and without regulation.
This isn't what Scalia meant and you know that.
Ive already said that the second amendment can be regulated and agree that common sense regulation makes sense. A liability policy doesn't fall under that category in my opinion.
Does the liability policy cost $10 and last for five years?
I'm for voter ID laws but I've always said that there should be a fee waiver and that every effort should be made to reach every potential voter.
Why does a voter ID law deny anybody the right to vote?
Does the liability policy cost $10 and last for five years?
I'm for voter ID laws but I've always said that there should be a fee waiver and that every effort should be made to reach every potential voter.