RChildress107
Well-known member
I would refer to them as observations rather than accusations based on watching a significant amount of college basketball during my life. Also, scouts and recruiting analysts misevaluate players fairly often. The difference between a 5-star player and a top-60 4-star player is marginal quite frequently.
This is just so wrong. Go back and look at the Scout rankings from 2002 to 2010 (this year's seniors). A 5 star ranking was about 70-75% accurate for a high level of success at the college level, and about 55-60% indicative of playing in the NBA.
A top 60 4 star player on the other hand was about 30-40% indicative of a high level of success at the college level and maybe 15-20% indicative of making the NBA. I was pretty liberal with the top-60 guys too. My basic standard in looking through those was "have I heard of you".
A sample year (2006): The following 5 star players (out of 28) played in the NBA at some point: (* played less than 100 games)
Oden*, KD, Brandan Wright, Spencer Hawes, Ty Lawson, Thaddeus Young, Wayne Ellington, Chase Budinger, Darrell Arthur, Brook Lopez, Sherron Collins*, Daequan Cook, Javaris Crittenton, Gerald Henderson, Quincy Pondexter, Lance Thomas, Damion James*, Robin Lopez, Dajuan Summers*, Earl Clark, Derrick Character*, Mike Conley
That's 22/28 (78.5%) with 17 playing more than 100 games (60.7%).
In contrast here's the list of the next 32 guys who played in the NBA:
DJ Augustin, Hasheem Thabeet, Jerome Dyson*, Jerry Smith*, Jodie Meeks, Jarvis Varnado*, Marreese Speights, Patrick Beverly.
That's 8/32 (25%) with only 5 of 32 playing more than 15 games (16%).
5 star players have 5 stars for a reason.
*** While going through these names I discovered that after college Brian Zoubek started a bakery called Dream Puffz***
Edit: Oden has only played 87 games in his career. I knew it was bad but didn't know it was that bad. That makes me sad.
Last edited: