wfumike02
Well-known member
- Joined
- Mar 15, 2011
- Messages
- 3,896
- Reaction score
- 232
I would say either Drew or Brad Brownell.
I've never heard anything even remotely suggesting Brownell was dirty. Is there something I'm missing?
I would say either Drew or Brad Brownell.
I've never heard anything even remotely suggesting Brownell was dirty. Is there something I'm missing?
This should just be auto-posted every time a Dino thread has the word "extension" in it. I'm not sure why people don't understand the concept. Even when it was issued everyone on the boards knew it had nothing to do with his longevity.
*edited out*? The bottom line is Dino fucked our team in the postseason every year, and that was reason enough. All other details, hard feelings, inclinations, mistakes, etc - at most they moved up his firing by a year.
There is no way Dino ever would have made it through this season. Zero chance. None whatsoever.
Keep in mind that Jeff Battle was the first assistant offered the job (if I recall correctly). That was for a reason, and it may have been for several different ones. If Ron Wellman felt he didn't have time to get another coach, or he wanted to keep a coach from the staff, Dino Gaudio would have been the next most feasible option, even if he was not necessarily a very good one.
So Wellman is to blame for these culture-less Dino recruits because he gave him extension so he could recruit.
Not following. The entire reason for Dino's promotion was to keep our recruits at the time.
A few years later with nothing to show for that strategy in the postseason and the direction changed to more coaching, less recruiting.
Wellman's job is to pick a guy and then give him every chance to succeed. The extension did just that. Dino didn't succeed, had plenty of time and talent to do so, and was fired.
Who are "all these culture-less recruits" you're referring to? I'd think our players would be pretty offended by you referring to them like that.
Not following. The entire reason for Dino's promotion was to keep our recruits at the time.
A few years later with nothing to show for that strategy in the postseason and the direction changed to more coaching, less recruiting.
Wellman's job is to pick a guy and then give him every chance to succeed. The extension did just that. Dino didn't succeed, had plenty of time and talent to do so, and was fired.
Who are "all these culture-less recruits" you're referring to? I'd think our players would be pretty offended by you referring to them like that.
If he was the Asst that kept the levity up when other coaches were being the "bad cop" then I could easily see that being an issue. Such a change of gears for both the coach and the players.
Coach Gaudio received an extension at the end of the 2009 season. He was fired at the end of the 2010 season.
Everyone realizes this.
Ph is saying it's Wellman's fault that we have Dino-style recruits because he gave him an extension. The extension had nothing to do with it. Plus we have some great guys from Dino's classes, so I'm just wondering who specifically he's targeting as culture-less.
When Battle turned down the job after Skip died we should have gone after a big name immediately and just hoped the recruits would stay.
The [Redacted] hire backlash is Wellman paying for that mistake. Outside of landing Bob Knight or someone ridiculous, whatever coach was hired was going to lose a ton of games and suffer a huge amount of criticism. It would inevitably fall on Wellman.
I don't want to put words in anyone's mouth, but the "culture-less" meme comes from Wellman belaboring the "culture change" this season. It's very Maoist.
Right, the fact that we are going after a "new culture" insinuates that the old culture we had was "bad".
Yeah. It's pretty disingenuous to give a guy an extension so he could recruit effectively then fire that guy (and only that guy) shortly thereafter in effort to improve the culture around the program.
So your argument is he shouldn't have given him the extension? That he should have hung him out to dry with ESPN announcing him "on the hot seat" and recruits wondering if he'd be around the next year, etc?
And that he should have taken that route despite not knowing at the time whether he'd be firing him after the next year or two?
Pure, perfect, hindsight. The problem I have with your posts like this Ph is that they're framed by this need to blame, second-guess, condescend, etc. Sometimes someone makes a decision, like the extension, that based on information at the time is perfectly reasonable. Just like promoting Dino. That turned out to be a huge mistake, but you can't blame the guy and act like Wellman was a moron for doing so just because you know what happened since that point.
(Note - This has nothing to do with [Redacted]. No hindsight involved there - plenty of people, myself included, didn't like that hire.)