Wakeforest22890
Snowpom
If the FBI were intentionally misleading the FISA Judge why would you include a footnote at all? I’ll hang up and listen
To clarify: affirmatively providing knowledge anywhere in a court filing certainly qualifies as volunteering information.
If the FBI were intentionally misleading the FISA Judge why would you include a footnote at all? I’ll hang up and listen
I thought you hung up? WTF is going on here?
I thought you hung up? WTF is going on here?
Trump on the Schiff memo.
It's 10 pages including footnotes.
Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant
So the political motivation behind the dossier was disclosed in the FISA application. Good job everyone.
buried in the footnotes
Truth. My understanding though is that the documents in the FISA process included in a footnote regarding the partisan funding of the dossier and that Nunes is now going all “well who reads the footnotes anyways” on us to cover his (or the GOP’s) own negligence and misrepresentation.
this thing with the footnotes is hilarious.
Just so we are clear, if crimes or unethical behavior are discovered in the course of opposition political research, that information shouldn’t be handed over to investigative bodies for processing? What if they found out he fucked a little kid or stole old ladies’ retirements or sold arms to gangs? No good because Hillary hired a PI to find it?
Just so we are clear, if crimes or unethical behavior are discovered in the course of opposition political research, that information shouldn’t be handed over to investigative bodies for processing? What if they found out he fucked a little kid or stole old ladies’ retirements or sold arms to gangs? No good because Hillary hired a PI to find it?
Yeah this point is getting lost in this ridiculous debate. Even if Steele was Mr. Democrat McPartisan, if he uncovered legitimate evidence of serious crimes by a Presidential candidate, then it would be a dereliction of duty by the judicial system to ignore it because of the source of the information. Sure it would be prudent to consider the political source and you probably want to verify everything through other sources but you can't just throw the info in the trash.
And Christopher Steele was no partisan hack either. He's a former MI6 agent and expert on Russia who was responsible for taking down Sepp Blatter and FIFA. He was also considered a very credible source by the FBI and intelligence community. And he didn't even know who was financing the project.